Advance Publications, Inc.

O. PAUL ELDER    LIVE OAK, FLORIDA 32064

Posted at 7:38am on Monday, October 20th, 2008

What is the country of origin for the stock holder with the most stock?

O. PAUL ELDER    LIVE OAK, FLORIDA 32064

Posted at 7:31am on Monday, October 20th, 2008

Do you have an online archive site where we can visit your past issues? From what we have seen and heard so far you are fair in
your reporting, however, before we subscribe we would like to see some back issues.

Paul Kastner    Wailuku

Posted at 8:07pm on Monday, July 14th, 2008

I disagree with Ms. Collier. To portray Sen. McCain and his wife in the manner she suggests would be just as immoral and vulgar as what David Remmick, the editor of The New Yorker, has already done. This type of slandering of the presidential candidates needs to stop.
However, I certainly wouldn't mind seeing the next cover of this magazine feature Mr. Remmick and everyone else in The New Yorker's management positions who thought this was a good idea, dressed in clown suits, sitting in dog waste and declaring "We're all a bunch of duffuses!"
I'm sure that won't happen, however, Instead, the magazine will probably have record sales and make a bunch of money which is, of course, what they are hoping for all along. After all, just look at how much publicity they're getting. Also, I believe Mr. Remmick and his dittoheads are the types that can dish it out but can't take it themselves. So don't expect them to apologize. They're too busy patting themselves on the back.

Jane Newhouse    NY, USA

Posted at 7:32pm on Monday, July 14th, 2008

Oh were the posts getting to close to the truth? Awe poor baby. Can't take the heat, but you still dish the stuff out every chance you get. Such cowardly Cheney heads.

oiuus    CA

Posted at 7:29pm on Monday, July 14th, 2008

AH so you do censor/moderate. Do you use an automated sysytem? If so, it must have many words and phrases that it looks for.And all I wanted was to post my reaction to the New Yorker's neoconservative tactics and attempting to to call it just satire. Yeah Right! OK so I know this won't get online either, but hell, at least I was able to vent my dissatisfaction with The New Yorker. But then again, I'm certain that after your cover page, many more have on sites that do not censor. EFF YOU

insideoutgraphics    Fl. USA

Posted at 7:23pm on Monday, July 14th, 2008

Hmm, I wonder why why my initial comment has not been posted? Is the site now censoring posts that disagree with the New Yorker? Let's see where this one goes.

Robert Owen    New York

Posted at 6:37pm on Monday, July 14th, 2008

Makes you wonder about the agenda of this company. Are the owners afraid of black president who might be sympathetic to Muslims? What is the religion and ethnicity of the owners?

JInsideoutgraphics    Fl

Posted at 6:17pm on Monday, July 14th, 2008

Hard to believe they actually tried to legitimize it by referring to it as satire. I see it as a blatant neoconservative tactic. Disgusting, hateful and beyond words actually. I do hope that the magazine goes under. Because there is absolutely nothing satrical about the cover except for showing just how low the New Yorker can go. I think they shot a huge hole in their own feet with this one and the blowback will be seen in the decline in subscriptions. Like my Mother said, I wish I had a subscription so I could call up and cancel it out of protest.

Diana Geiger    Longmont, Colorado

Posted at 4:14pm on Monday, July 14th, 2008

I am shocked at what I saw today on your magazine as it reminds me of living in the sixties as a little girl when racist comments were a daily event and people lived in fear of other peoples differences. Give me a break,you want me to believe your intent was satire? Never! I know exactly what your intentions were by publishing it. I see right through it. Shame on you.

kila a. smith    atlanta , georgia

Posted at 3:44pm on Monday, July 14th, 2008

I thought the cover was supposed to be satire not blatent racial stereotyping. Sales must be down. I will make sure that any magaizine that you publish will never cross my threshold. Will let every one I know to cancel as well. ( W and Lucky former subscriber)