Advance Publications, Inc. profile and media properties

misiscollusia    

Posted at 6:27am on Thursday, August 19, 2010

i'm new... hope to brief nearly more time after time!

rwbeachbum    vancouver,wa

Posted at 12:37pm on Monday, March 1, 2010

I have to agree with you mizliz. I sold media for more than twenty years and I must tell you that I am ashamed of my profession for what it has done to our county. And I am sick of being spoon fed and brainwashed bits of info in sound bites of what they want us to believe.

MizLiz    Vancouver WA

Posted at 9:50am on Friday, January 22, 2010

I subscribe to the Oregonian. I wish I didn't, I wish there was a comparable newspaper in my area, but The Columbian is pretty poor. I have watched with dismay while this paper becomes the mouthpiece for conservative big business. The latest insult to us all is the wrap-around front page ads against initiatives 66 and 67 which would increase the corporate minimum tax from a laughable $10 to $150.

And aren't the rich folk just furious! Who cares about schools, firefighters, law enforcement etc?
The Oregonian editorial page has become a propaganda outlet. Their latest "triumph" is the Supreme Court decision just yesterday to allow corporations to outright buy their political candidates with no limits. We're in trouble, people, and it's due to people like the Newhouses.

Pavel Goberman    Beaverton, OR USA

Posted at 11:22pm on Thursday, August 6, 2009

In the Primary 2008 Election, the Oregonian newspaper and TV stations in Portland, Oregon, refused to invite me on debate / forum of candidates for US Senate. It is a violation of the Constitution of the USA: USC T 47, section 315. It is a crime.
What a shame on the media. All money, money and money.
The money will NOT shield this nation from weapons of mass destruction. And dead people do not need money.

Pavel Goberman - Candidate for US Senator, OR
www.getenergized.com

Pavel Goberman    Beaverton, OR USA

Posted at 11:12pm on Thursday, August 6, 2009

The media for own huge monetary benefits promotes bribery, corruption and political prostitutions, and an idiots get elected and reelected that create a poor economy, a danger to our national security and etc.

Pavel Goberman - Candidate for US Senator, OR
www.getenergized.com/vote.html

O. PAUL ELDER    LIVE OAK, FLORIDA 32064

Posted at 7:38am on Monday, October 20, 2008

What is the country of origin for the stock holder with the most stock?

O. PAUL ELDER    LIVE OAK, FLORIDA 32064

Posted at 7:31am on Monday, October 20, 2008

Do you have an online archive site where we can visit your past issues? From what we have seen and heard so far you are fair in
your reporting, however, before we subscribe we would like to see some back issues.

Paul Kastner    Wailuku

Posted at 8:07pm on Monday, July 14, 2008

I disagree with Ms. Collier. To portray Sen. McCain and his wife in the manner she suggests would be just as immoral and vulgar as what David Remmick, the editor of The New Yorker, has already done. This type of slandering of the presidential candidates needs to stop.
However, I certainly wouldn't mind seeing the next cover of this magazine feature Mr. Remmick and everyone else in The New Yorker's management positions who thought this was a good idea, dressed in clown suits, sitting in dog waste and declaring "We're all a bunch of duffuses!"
I'm sure that won't happen, however, Instead, the magazine will probably have record sales and make a bunch of money which is, of course, what they are hoping for all along. After all, just look at how much publicity they're getting. Also, I believe Mr. Remmick and his dittoheads are the types that can dish it out but can't take it themselves. So don't expect them to apologize. They're too busy patting themselves on the back.

Jane Newhouse    NY, USA

Posted at 7:32pm on Monday, July 14, 2008

Oh were the posts getting to close to the truth? Awe poor baby. Can't take the heat, but you still dish the stuff out every chance you get. Such cowardly Cheney heads.

oiuus    CA

Posted at 7:29pm on Monday, July 14, 2008

AH so you do censor/moderate. Do you use an automated sysytem? If so, it must have many words and phrases that it looks for.And all I wanted was to post my reaction to the New Yorker's neoconservative tactics and attempting to to call it just satire. Yeah Right! OK so I know this won't get online either, but hell, at least I was able to vent my dissatisfaction with The New Yorker. But then again, I'm certain that after your cover page, many more have on sites that do not censor. EFF YOU