Comments to date: 24. This is page 1 of 2.
 |
samuel g. bailey burgess, va. | Posted at 8:57am on Wednesday, July 13, 2011 |
The article that your Washington Business Journal did on me & my Copyright Infringement case against BET, Paramount Pictures, & Viacom was subjectively biased in favor of the crooked Defendants. Your article was so biased that it contained slanders statements that damaged my professional, personal, and legal credibility. My advise to u & your co. is it would be very wise to straighten this matter out very soon, or a specific diencephalic decision will need to be made cognizant to this subject matter.
|
jeff locust grove,georgia | Posted at 10:41am on Monday, March 28, 2011 |
this this the worst company i have ever delt with. i was supposed to recieve my first magazine a couple of weeks ago and i still have not. all they tell me is that it must be lost and im cant get another one for like three weeks.by then the masters will be over so it wont help me then. i use ups everyday,all they have to do is send it that way and i could get it in a few days. these people dont give a dam about their customers and i hope they go out of business,i am going to tell everyone i know and get them to tell everyone they know never to get golf digest again. i hope this helps someone to not have to go through the same thing i have .
|
Media Owners editors Boulder Colorado USA | Posted at 11:23am on Wednesday, February 16, 2011 |
-- February 15, 2011 -- Margo Coble is now vice president of marketing, local digital strategy at Advance Publications. She was previously vice president of integrated media at Parade Magazine.
|
Media Owners editors Boulder Colorado USA | Posted at 7:51pm on Tuesday, December 14, 2010 |
-- December 14, 2010 -- Andrew Siegel is now senior vice president of corporate development at Advance Publications. He was previously head of corporate development at Yahoo!
|
rwbeachbum vancouver,wa | Posted at 12:37pm on Monday, March 1, 2010 |
I have to agree with you mizliz. I sold media for more than twenty years and I must tell you that I am ashamed of my profession for what it has done to our county. And I am sick of being spoon fed and brainwashed bits of info in sound bites of what they want us to believe.
|
MizLiz Vancouver WA | Posted at 9:50am on Friday, January 22, 2010 |
I subscribe to the Oregonian. I wish I didn't, I wish there was a comparable newspaper in my area, but The Columbian is pretty poor. I have watched with dismay while this paper becomes the mouthpiece for conservative big business. The latest insult to us all is the wrap-around front page ads against initiatives 66 and 67 which would increase the corporate minimum tax from a laughable $10 to $150.
And aren't the rich folk just furious! Who cares about schools, firefighters, law enforcement etc?
The Oregonian editorial page has become a propaganda outlet. Their latest "triumph" is the Supreme Court decision just yesterday to allow corporations to outright buy their political candidates with no limits. We're in trouble, people, and it's due to people like the Newhouses.
|
Pavel Goberman Beaverton, OR USA | Posted at 11:22pm on Thursday, August 6, 2009 |
In the Primary 2008 Election, the Oregonian newspaper and TV stations in Portland, Oregon, refused to invite me on debate / forum of candidates for US Senate. It is a violation of the Constitution of the USA: USC T 47, section 315. It is a crime.
What a shame on the media. All money, money and money.
The money will NOT shield this nation from weapons of mass destruction. And dead people do not need money.
Pavel Goberman - Candidate for US Senator, OR
www.getenergized.com
|
Pavel Goberman Beaverton, OR USA | Posted at 11:12pm on Thursday, August 6, 2009 |
The media for own huge monetary benefits promotes bribery, corruption and political prostitutions, and an idiots get elected and reelected that create a poor economy, a danger to our national security and etc.
Pavel Goberman - Candidate for US Senator, OR
www.getenergized.com/vote.html
|
O. PAUL ELDER LIVE OAK, FLORIDA 32064 | Posted at 7:38am on Monday, October 20, 2008 |
What is the country of origin for the stock holder with the most stock?
|
O. PAUL ELDER LIVE OAK, FLORIDA 32064 | Posted at 7:31am on Monday, October 20, 2008 |
Do you have an online archive site where we can visit your past issues? From what we have seen and heard so far you are fair in
your reporting, however, before we subscribe we would like to see some back issues.
|
Paul Kastner Wailuku | Posted at 8:07pm on Monday, July 14, 2008 |
I disagree with Ms. Collier. To portray Sen. McCain and his wife in the manner she suggests would be just as immoral and vulgar as what David Remmick, the editor of The New Yorker, has already done. This type of slandering of the presidential candidates needs to stop.
However, I certainly wouldn't mind seeing the next cover of this magazine feature Mr. Remmick and everyone else in The New Yorker's management positions who thought this was a good idea, dressed in clown suits, sitting in dog waste and declaring "We're all a bunch of duffuses!"
I'm sure that won't happen, however, Instead, the magazine will probably have record sales and make a bunch of money which is, of course, what they are hoping for all along. After all, just look at how much publicity they're getting. Also, I believe Mr. Remmick and his dittoheads are the types that can dish it out but can't take it themselves. So don't expect them to apologize. They're too busy patting themselves on the back.
|
Jane Newhouse NY, USA | Posted at 7:32pm on Monday, July 14, 2008 |
Oh were the posts getting to close to the truth? Awe poor baby. Can't take the heat, but you still dish the stuff out every chance you get. Such cowardly Cheney heads.
|
oiuus CA | Posted at 7:29pm on Monday, July 14, 2008 |
AH so you do censor/moderate. Do you use an automated sysytem? If so, it must have many words and phrases that it looks for.And all I wanted was to post my reaction to the New Yorker's neoconservative tactics and attempting to to call it just satire. Yeah Right! OK so I know this won't get online either, but hell, at least I was able to vent my dissatisfaction with The New Yorker. But then again, I'm certain that after your cover page, many more have on sites that do not censor. EFF YOU
|
insideoutgraphics Fl. USA | Posted at 7:23pm on Monday, July 14, 2008 |
Hmm, I wonder why why my initial comment has not been posted? Is the site now censoring posts that disagree with the New Yorker? Let's see where this one goes.
|
Robert Owen New York | Posted at 6:37pm on Monday, July 14, 2008 |
Makes you wonder about the agenda of this company. Are the owners afraid of black president who might be sympathetic to Muslims? What is the religion and ethnicity of the owners?
|
JInsideoutgraphics Fl | Posted at 6:17pm on Monday, July 14, 2008 |
Hard to believe they actually tried to legitimize it by referring to it as satire. I see it as a blatant neoconservative tactic. Disgusting, hateful and beyond words actually. I do hope that the magazine goes under. Because there is absolutely nothing satrical about the cover except for showing just how low the New Yorker can go. I think they shot a huge hole in their own feet with this one and the blowback will be seen in the decline in subscriptions. Like my Mother said, I wish I had a subscription so I could call up and cancel it out of protest.
|
Diana Geiger Longmont, Colorado | Posted at 4:14pm on Monday, July 14, 2008 |
I am shocked at what I saw today on your magazine as it reminds me of living in the sixties as a little girl when racist comments were a daily event and people lived in fear of other peoples differences. Give me a break,you want me to believe your intent was satire? Never! I know exactly what your intentions were by publishing it. I see right through it. Shame on you.
|
kila a. smith atlanta , georgia | Posted at 3:44pm on Monday, July 14, 2008 |
I thought the cover was supposed to be satire not blatent racial stereotyping. Sales must be down. I will make sure that any magaizine that you publish will never cross my threshold. Will let every one I know to cancel as well. ( W and Lucky former subscriber)
|
mac cleveland | Posted at 3:14pm on Monday, July 14, 2008 |
The Newhouses are the same family that made the Cleveland Plain Dealer endorse Bush over Kerry after the staff voted almost unanimously for Kerry. The Newhouses constantly degrade local Cleveland democratic office holders as well. They are also Neocons. So you have to figure they are not Obama supporters.
|
Teresa Collier Dulles, Va | Posted at 2:39pm on Monday, July 14, 2008 |
I'm outraged but not surprised by the Obama “satire” on the cover of the New Yorker. The editorial board’s blatant attempts to paint the Obamas as Muslims and terrorists(?) is not only outrageous but offensive. I’ll be waiting to see a cover featuring John Macain in full grand dragon garb and his wife as miss scarlet with a cross burning as the backdrop. You can be sure from this day forward I will not line your corporation’s pockets with any more of my money as I will cease buying any of your publications and I will vehemently encourage everyone I know to do the same.
|
